max / makenotwork
1 file changed,
+2 insertions,
-2 deletions
| @@ -105,13 +105,13 @@ We will never build generative AI tools or features into the product. No AI writ | |||
| 105 | 105 | ||
| 106 | 106 | **Platform development** uses LLM-assisted tooling openly. LLMs reduce costs and let a solo developer ship features at a pace that would otherwise require a team. This is transparent in our commit history. | |
| 107 | 107 | ||
| 108 | - | The quality bar is non-negotiable: 1,900+ tests, property-based testing, mutation testing with a 99%+ kill rate, and regular code audits. LLM-generated code is held to the same standard as hand-written code. If it doesn't meet that bar, it gets rewritten until it does. | |
| 108 | + | The quality bar is non-negotiable: a comprehensive automated test suite, property-based testing, mutation testing, and regular code audits. LLM-generated code is held to the same standard as hand-written code. If it doesn't meet that bar, it gets rewritten until it does. | |
| 109 | 109 | ||
| 110 | 110 | There is a meaningful difference between using these tools to build infrastructure and selling their output as creative work. Our tier system reflects that distinction. | |
| 111 | 111 | ||
| 112 | 112 | A note from the founder: | |
| 113 | 113 | ||
| 114 | - | > The honest truth is that I would prefer not to use these tools. In my non-legal opinion, they are unethically built. They are also, frankly, mind-numbingly boring. At the same time, they allow a one-person team to build and maintain five products, a server with 80,000 lines of Rust, and comprehensive documentation, all without outside funding. As the codebase grows, their usefulness diminishes in favor of a more hands-on approach as the focus moves from scaffolding to testing and refinement. We will always be honest about what we use on our end. I will always try to be honest about how I feel about those tools. And as always, we would love to someday replace them with tools that we make or that our community makes: tools that are well-built, ethical, and that I can feel good about using. | |
| 114 | + | > The honest truth is that I would prefer not to use these tools. In my non-legal opinion, they are unethically built. They are also, frankly, mind-numbingly boring. At the same time, they allow a one-person team to build and maintain five products, a substantial server codebase, and comprehensive documentation, all without outside funding. As the codebase grows, their usefulness diminishes in favor of a more hands-on approach as the focus moves from scaffolding to testing and refinement. We will always be honest about what we use on our end. I will always try to be honest about how I feel about those tools. And as always, we would love to someday replace them with tools that we make or that our community makes: tools that are well-built, ethical, and that I can feel good about using. | |
| 115 | 115 | > | |
| 116 | 116 | > \- Max | |
| 117 | 117 |